![]() One additional comment: I'm a very long ACDSee user and this is the SINGLE REASON why I don't buy the Ultimate 2020 upgrade. I would love to hear ONE happy user (not an ACDSee employee) to prove me wrong with a really good HDR output file. Something ACDSee obviously can't do well, and now I realize why I shouldn't even expect it. So obviously there will be some extreme exposures in SOME of the pictures, the whole idea is for the HDR software to capture the wider range from multiple exposures into one HDR file. The whole purpose of HDR software is to increase the dynamic range, if it's too wide to be captured by the camera in one photo/exposure. To remind you, I have attached to my example files an excellent HDR output file (side by side with the terrible ACDSee HDR result), which I created with another simple HDR software, so this is definitely not the reason. I'm even more surprised to see the other comment (after 3 months!) about " One of the files you provided have no information in the highlights". BTW, reading through the posts above, you can see NO ONE received real answers to the raised problems, other than trying to blame the alignment (NOT an issue!) or the photographer capabilities. Yes, I've received general suggestions that are totally useless, I have never received a real answer to the problem I raised. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |